Anoma A1 Prehistoric: The art of leaving a mark
The A1 Prehistoric is not inspired by a racing car, a military instrument, a historical complication or a famous archive piece. Instead, it takes its cue from tools, objects created thousands of years ago by anonymous makers who shaped stone through repeated impact and judgement. There is no attempt here to dress an existing shape in a new theme.
The case itself carries the evidence of its making, in the same way a hand axe carries the evidence of the hand that struck it. Rough surfaces sit against engineered tolerances, industrial steel is worked until it reads as something closer to worn rock, and a named independent watchmaker builds a piece that deliberately echoes the anonymity of prehistoric craft. The contrast is the entire argument, and Anoma has been careful not to soften it.
Anoma is a London-based independent watch brand founded by Matteo Violet Vianello, and this particular model in the range only makes sense in the context of what came before it. The original challenged conventional watch proportions with its rounded triangular case, a shape that owed more to architecture and modernist design than to the codes of traditional watchmaking. Vianello has never positioned the brand as a reference to established luxury icons. The intent has been to build a recognisable visual language from first principles, and the A1’s case shape was the first statement of that intent. It raises an obvious question before the this particular edition is even introduced: why commit to a case shape this unusual in the first place, rather than working within a form the market already understands?
The answer becomes clearer once the Prehistoric edition enters the conversation. Where the original A1 spoke in the vocabulary of modernism, this edition reaches further back, drawing on the display of stone tools alongside the sculptural work of Constantin Brâncuși. What links the two is a fascination with objects where the process of creation remains visible on the surface. Early tools were never polished products in the way we now expect manufactured objects to be. Their surfaces recorded the making, blow by blow, and that record was inseparable from the object itself. Anoma has translated that idea into a contemporary manufacturing context, without pretending the watch is primitive or raw in any diminished sense. What is on offer here is controlled imperfection, achieved with the same discipline a watchmaker would apply to a mirror-polished bevel.




The case is where this argument is made most directly, and it is the heart of the piece. Built in 316L stainless steel, the A1’s rounded triangular geometry is already unconventional before any finishing is applied. What changes the picture entirely is the hand-chiselled surface, which runs against the grain of how luxury watch finishing usually operates. Traditional watchmaking tends to hide human intervention behind perfect polishing and uniform brushing, smoothing away any trace of the hand that did the work. The A1 Prehistoric does the opposite. It exposes the hand rather than concealing it. Light catches the uneven surfaces differently depending on the angle, shadows form and shift across the cuts as the wrist moves, and because the chiselling is done by hand rather than reproduced by machine, no two cases carry quite the same pattern.
Steven Brunel is responsible for the hand engraving on each case, working with traditional techniques that cannot be compressed into an industrial process without losing what makes them worth doing. Each case takes real time to finish, and that time is what a machine cannot replicate. Brunel controls where a strike lands and where it does not, which is what separates this surface from anything that merely simulates a worn or distressed finish.

The dial continues the same language rather than offering a contrast to it. Cut in brass, it carries hundreds of individually worked lines, and the texture relates directly to the texture of the case rather than existing as a separate design decision. Under changing light, the dial shifts in the same way the case does, catching and releasing brightness as the angle moves. The palette stays restrained throughout, which keeps the attention on texture rather than colour. There is no need to reach for language about light performing tricks or the eye being seduced. What happens is simpler and more honest than that: the surface behaves differently depending on where you stand, because it was never meant to behave the same way twice.
None of this would matter if the watch failed on the wrist, so the proportions deserve equal attention. The triangular case wears differently from a round watch, sitting against the wrist in a way that changes how the piece reads in daily use rather than only on a table under studio light. The crown is hidden, keeping the profile clean, and the caseback is curved to follow the wrist rather than sit flat against it. None of this reads as compromise for the sake of a striking silhouette. The design remains practical enough to wear without thinking about it, which is not something every conceptually driven watch manages.
The unit runs on a Sellita SW100 automatic calibre, a movement valued for reliability and ease of servicing rather than any headline complication. It supports the design rather than competing with it for attention, and Anoma has left the case and dial to carry the story. Some buyers at this price point will inevitably compare movement specifications against those of more established manufactures, and on paper that comparison will not always favour the brand. But independent watchmaking has never been judged fairly on specification alone, and it should not be here either. The question an independent brand answers is not whether it can out-engineer a century-old manufacture. It is whether it has something to say that nobody else is saying.



That question sits at the centre of why this timepiece matters beyond its own case dimensions. The modern watch market is crowded with heritage reissues and familiar formulas, most of them built around nostalgia for a design language that already exists. Independent brands only survive by offering something distinct from that pattern, and Anoma has chosen not to recreate a forgotten era of watchmaking. It is building a new visual language instead, one that borrows from architecture, sculpture and now stone-age craft, and that willingness to look outside the usual reference points is what gives the brand its relevance in a market that often rewards the opposite instinct.
Production is limited, and the price reflects that scarcity alongside the labour involved in each case. The buyer this watch appeals to is not chasing the most technically complicated movement available for the money. They are choosing an object with a clear design idea behind it and visible evidence of the hand that made it, and that is a different kind of value than the one most luxury watch marketing appeals to. It asks the owner to value process as much as result, and to recognise that the two cannot actually be separated in this particular case.
The A1 Prehistoric succeeds because its unusual surface is not decoration applied to an existing watch. The surface is the watch. Every mark explains why it exists, connecting a modern mechanical object with the oldest tradition of shaping materials by hand.
Further information: https://anomawatches.com/
All materials are reproduced in good faith and remain the copyright of their respective owners. ©Luxfanzine, 2026

